>>7458047Not him, but I absolutely agree. These wallpapers are utter trash. If I say someone use any of these, I would assume they had no taste. I don't like being harsh for the sake of being harsh, these are just terrible wallpapers.
Good luck masking your complete lack of taste by implying that having standards equates to being a cunt all the time.
If this was bait, good job.
>>7458147You don't need to be able to design a good wallpaper to spot a bad one. That's like saying that movie critics need to be able to make movies to be taken seriously. Only brain dead people use this argument. In the spirit of constructive criticism, a more accurate response would be asking anon to post a wallpaper that he thinks is good.
Sometimes it feels like this whole board is one huge hugbox for shitty wallpaper posting.
>>7458729The only burden to this site is the idiot who has a problem with an anon calling out wallpapers for being shitty. Multi-replying is necessary to get the point across, and is not done to get attention. Even if it was, you're the idiot that gave him exactly what he wanted. Either way, you're stupid.
>>7457929>>7458960You guys are based, I wish this board was made up of only people like you
