>>7725782How hypocritical and ironic that Christians like yourself use the label "virgin" as a derogatory, demeaning, debasing way to attack people you don't agree with. I mean, I already know you're a piece of shit, so it's no surprise to me, but you are such a deceiving piece of shit.
Let's run through it together and remind everyone why you are such a hypocritical piece of shit, shall we?
Do you not agree that Jesus of Nazarath (also known as Yeshua ben Joseph or Joshua son of Josef or Jesus Christ or any number of other titles) was a virgin and died as such? Do you not agree that Christianity is all about "what would Jesus do?", that is to say, attempting to emulate the life and values of your imagined Jesus?
So what would Jesus do? He would remain a virgin. In fact, Paul of Tarsus implores all Christians to be virgins because the end is coming (always coming, never arriving), and besides, "people are not married nor given into marriage" in the resurrection. Ergo, everyone is eternally a virgin in the afterlife, if not this life.
In Christianity, at least the historical branches of it (Roman Catholic Christianity, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, etc.) even sex (coitus) that is for the express purposes of reproduction is considered a venial sin. Christianity, as with other religions (Hinduism & Buddhism, to give two examples), is extremely anti-sex and anti-sexual. Like Hinduism and Buddhism, unlike Judaism & Islam, Christianity tends toward asceticism and monasticism (even if immersed in the secular world, such as Opus Dei).
How interesting you consider virginity to be holy, yet use it was a weapon to attack others and demean them.
Fucking moron.
