>>7863635>The team deserves creditYes, they do. But that watermark is incredibly obnoxious. There are ten thousand ways to watermark a work without destroying it. It's very counterproductive in cases like this. Had they come up with something subtle, many of these would have been magnificent papes and years worth of free marketing. The way this watermark is implemented is like taking neon spray paint to a da Vinci painting and spraying his name across the bottom quarter to make sure everyone knows it's an authentic da Vinci.
Meaning, nice thread and all, but not one saved. Appreciate your effort and fun to look at once, but unfortunately that's all. Not your fault, just a horribad design decision by the team that otherwise came up with some interesting art.
