>>7899636yes, and that's the 4K version that was downsized to make the HD version of the image at the top of this thread. I know this because I was the one that downsized the 4k image to HD. :)
but there's no point in us getting all caught up in a debate on upscaling/downsizing of one particular image, that'll just derail the thread for no reason, the image is posted and it's somewhat satisfactory.
>>7899363>Still, there are some pre-XP Windows papes we need in HD - and far more so with classic Mac OS 8/9 papes.was thinking about working on this again earlier today in fact. I have a lot of old stock papes saved, particular Mac stuff, but some Windows stuff too, in very small resolutions, e.g. 800x600, 1024x768, etc. etc. that I started converting to HD1080 resolution a while ago and then had to stop because reasons.
