>>7962428>/s/ should naturally be wallpaper sized images anywayNot necessarily, nor is everything there wallpaper quality. Also, /s/ allows more explicit content ("softcore pornography") than /wg/ (which is supposed to be limited to "artistic nudes"). Some of us may not want to wade through /s/ looking for wallpaper-quality artsy nudes.
>Take it there.If you think something actually breaks the board rules (i.e., that a specific image qualifies as "porn" rather than "artistic nudity") then you should report it. But I suggest you educate yourself first on what the rules actually are: when the first "take it to /s/" message was posted ITT, the only images weren't even NSFW by 4chan's definition, let alone against /wg/ rules.
>A lot of us also have other people in our lives, around us. Most of us don't want a porn wallpaper.No one is forcing you to. Others may have have no such qualms. The fact remains that this isn't a blue board and that you shouldn't complain when there's NSFW pics posted, to say nothing of pics that would be allowed even on blue boards, as many of the images ITT would be.
