>>1423317>Which one do you recommend me to export so that it weighs as little as possible, does not lose quality and thus convert it to webm format without losing more image quality?NTA but it doesn't really matter what format you export it as. The video format is simply a container and quality depends on the way it was recorded, color depth, compression, noise, pixels and most of all bitrate. Higher bitrate = higher quality video because it represents the amount of data being processed in a unit of time(kb/second). It also means larger file size. Other important part of video quality is the codec. A codec is software used for compression and decompression of video files and different codecs work on different hardware and handle things like color and details differently impacting the quality and size in the end. Some codecs are better than others in handling overall quality and size
In order to achieve satisfactory quality you need to experiment with different codecs, bitrate, colors etc. For example H.265(HEVC) can achieve up to 50% more compression than H.264(AVC) but it requires more horsepower. Then there are the GPU accelerated codecs like NVDEC optimized for offloading to full fixed-function decoding hardware like the video decoder on some(most?) GPUs. It works great and is magnitudes faster than CPU decoders(yet not as good).
All in all, the format doesn't matter. .webm is a fork of .mkv and has only millisecond precision in timestamps and have no DTS, only PTS and even PTS is in form of durations. This means that 24/1.001 frame rate will be not perfectly presented in mkv. All the frames will still be decoded the same but not perfectly in time like it would be in mp4.
Just play around with codecs, bitrate, noise and colors and you'll figure out what works for you. Export it as whatever you like idk go with mpeg4 and work from there.