>>5691476no dust blown away from underneath the landing capusle either
>>5691469you spam unrelated pics and keep screeching about "shill disinfo bot", but if i were then obviously my info would be faulty, and if thats the case it wouldnt be a problem to point out, yet i never see you doing that mate, so yeah, show that my info is wrong or shut up.
>>5691474hmmm
>>5691482i forgot what it was, but there actually was some good explenation for that one. i think some footage that actually shows the guy like that being broadcasted with the other being coincidental, or maybe it was forged specifically to cover it up. dunno.