so how big is north america really?
and someone in another discussion mentioned this could happen by taking pictures at different distances and it could be, but:
pic 2 (Blue marble 2002) has been done from 700km height
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/BlueMarble/BlueMarble_2002.php>Flying over 700 km above the Earth onboard the Terra satellitethe 4th picture (Blue Marble 2012) was made with the NPP/Suomi NPP satellite orbiting at 824km
https://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_2159.html>A 'Blue Marble' image of the Earth taken from the VIIRS instrument aboard NASA's most recently launched Earth-observing satellite - Suomi NPP.https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suomi_NPP>The satellite was placed into a sun-synchronous orbit 824 km (512 miles) above the Earth.So when the distance is the issue of the size difference the sizes should be reversed and i doubt it woul create such a big difference since the difference in distance is far smaller. .
The pic allegedly gets created by taking a lot of smaller pics and stitching them together, but still that would mean that they do a fucking poor job in creating an accurate depiction of our planet when there are such big differences
>>5407155me saying im not a bot proofs nothing, since you wont find a bot admitting to be a bot. so there is no reason to say. so im not a bot, but there is no reason for you to believe me. best thing is to look upon the info i post and judge based on that
>>5407156in order to LARP i first would have to claim to be someone. if anything you go and try to discredit call it "ARG". learn the proper terminology retard
