ITT show signs that NASA is faking stuff and keeping shit secret from us
Ok, lets start with a simple question:
Why wasnt this (pic related with adjusted contrast and brightness) closer looked at? This very well could indicate that at one point there was sophisticated life on Mars, yet they seem to just ignore it. Here is the original pic from the NASA website
https://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00184/mcam/0184MR0925102000E1_DXXX.jpg These bubbles you see on pretty much any spacewalk footage (guy is a flatearther but his NASA videso are actually rather good)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PB7AwZzaOo NASA cutting livefeed just when something appears in the background
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAsxflfMXtg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGlZLjFCB9E Also weird that you never see a complete orbit around the earth on their livestream. Usually whenever it gets dark, like so dark you dont even see lights from the cities anymore (which you should unless they shot up the crappiest camera you can find into space) the stream cuts off and continues when its bright day again. this day is an exception as it shows a bit of night and citylights, but still cuts to broad daylight at some point never showing a full orbit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddFvjfvPnqk >inb4 flat earther There are multiple reasons on why they could fake things which all have nothing to do with flat earth. They could try to hide Ay lmaos, secret military space programm, some hidden continent the elites use as their small paradise, some openings in the polar regions (Hollow Earth) or a sheme where they say nasa gets 20 billion a year, but will only get a few million for some fakery, coke and hookers, while the rest is used for blackprojects like some false flags, some coups against a government that doesnt want to be a puppet, or said military space programm
Either way I believe NASA isnt there to provide us any information.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>nibiru didn't come yet
Anonymous
that pic is from Doom 8-bit
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4374371 lol you're retarded
Anonymous
>same retarded German still making his daily /x/ tier thread
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Those "teeth' are just video artifacts. The eye is slightly interesting though
Anonymous
Anonymous
Also this here states on page 7 that NASA basically is just the public sector of the military spaceprogram and pretty much underlies it making me think its even more likely that NASA is mostly just a front to cover up the military program
https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP85-00821R000100110007-7.pdf Pic related, something flying around on mars, and again just ignored
https://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/proj/msl/redops/ods/surface/sol/00688/opgs/edr/ncam/NRB_458574869EDR_F0390444NCAM00295M_.JPG >>4374373 its not like i linked the
nasa.gov source in the same post or anything
>>4374375 >>4374377 >NASA and spaceexploration is paranormal sure
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4374371 Sorry to burst your bubble Hanz but that's just a rock
Anonymous
Anonymous
so how big is north america really?
and someone in another discussion mentioned this could happen by taking pictures at different distances and it could be, but:
pic 2 (Blue marble 2002) has been done from 700km height
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/BlueMarble/BlueMarble_2002.php >Flying over 700 km above the Earth onboard the Terra satellite the 4th picture (Blue Marble 2012) was made with the NPP/Suomi NPP sattalite orbiting at 824km
https://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_2159.html >A 'Blue Marble' image of the Earth taken from the VIIRS instrument aboard NASA's most recently launched Earth-observing satellite - Suomi NPP. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suomi_NPP >The satellite was placed into a sun-synchronous orbit 824 km (512 miles) above the Earth. So when the distance is the issue of the size difference the sizes should be reversed and i doubt it woul create such a big difference.
The pic allegedly gets created by taking a lot of smaller pics and stitching them together, but still that would mean that they do a fucking poor job in creating an accurate depiction of our planet when there are such big differences
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4374371 NASA is a burger-owned agency. Germ-bros need to get back to preparing the muzzy bulls for their wives and daughters and not worry what we do.
>...to provide "us" any information Anonymous
>N-Nasaa doesn't lieeee >Earth is a gloooobeeeee >Moon landing happened >What are you, a science denier??? >REEEEEEEEEE
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4374378 >conspiritard bullshit is /pol/ >>>/x/ Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4374383 Nukes and the moon landing will always be fake until they do it again.
Anonymous
>>4374383 >The Earth is flat Anonymous
>>4374386 Ok I am standing on my porch how do I tell what shape the earth is?
Anonymous
>>4374371 If you take 10 million pictures of rocks eventually you're going to find some that look a lot like faces. I bet there's also a lot rocks that look like dicks up there too, so what's your point?
Anonymous
Pic related shows there was no dust blown onto the foot of the landing module.
>inb4 the moon has no atmosphere and wouldnt blow up dust because of it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2As10bFzsw >inb4 without atmosphere nothing brakes the dust making it fly elsewhere surely a few corns of dust would have blown in a way to land on the foot when its blown in every fucking direction
>>4374383 hollow sphere actually
>>163344428 >>163344455 >>163344489 >>163345395 >>163359133 >>163359160 Anonymous
>>4374389 >hollow sphere fag sure
Anonymous
>fossilised eyeball.
Anonymous
>>4374386 it is mate. sorry if that rustles your brainlet jimmies. go find your mysterious magical curvature and come back when you've done so.
Anonymous
>>4374389 Could it be? The legendary Kraut conspiracy king of pol?
Anonymous
>>4374390 Anon are you the one who made this infographic? You need to name this model, I think it's a fascinating idea and worth exploring (atleast intellectually, I guess physically that's not possible)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4374394 nah some Netherlands anon posted it.
Anonymous
>>4374387 Here are a few ways to know
1: have an education
2: use a gravimeter to measure the gravity before and after the Moon is above you to see a slight change (oh wait you probably believe gravity doesn't exist because you're retarded)
3: Ship routes going around the world
4: Go on Google and look at fucking pictures of the earth
Maybe instead of doing all that, you should just neck yourself.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4374371 mars raw
mars color corrected
I hope I dont need to elaborate. (they are backwards.)
Anonymous
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2052819/NASA-raids-Dennys-Joann-Davis-74-tries-sell-Neil-Armstrong-moon-dust.html this one stated they let the old lady pee herself and sit in the pee for quite some time just because of some moon"rock"
However considdering this about the moonrocks
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html It may explain why they are so furious about it
Also im not saying we didnt go to the moon, nor that we cant go into space or anything like that. All im saying is they arent showing is real footage, or at least often not real footage. Some possible reasons:
>van allen belt would have destroyed the tapes either way, and a moonlanding without footage wouldnt be good propaganda >they feared it could go wrong and thus made fake footage in order to cover an eventual failure up and still sell it as success >something is on the moon we arent supposed to know about >we really didnt go to the moon at the very least it seems they dont want anyone to look into the tapes
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2009/jul/16/moon-landing-tapes-erased and the astronauts dont seem like people that are mentally stable enough to be send into space
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1S0oObHT0c >>4374393 are you the straya that always posts like 50 pastas in my threads? could it be?
if so, greetings
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4374396 So there is no way for me to tell the shape of the earth standing on my porch?
Anonymous
>>4374388 Rock-hard dicks?
Anonymous
>>4374392 >Provide no evidence door your theory >Insult people questioning your ridiculous theory. The reason you insult people that call your shitty theory shitty is because you have no evidence or understanding of physics
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4374387 if the porch is giving a view of the ocean you can see ships show up from the horizon.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4374389 no dust blown away from beneath the capsule during the landing appearently
Anonymous
>>4374373 No that’s actually a zoom in of a pic from, allegedly, Mars.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4374401 *for your theory
Anonymous
>>4374371 >ITT show signs that NASA is faking stuff and keeping shit secret from us They're just keeping it secret from you, but they tell the rest of us, as long as we don't tell you.
Seems kind of mean, but it's been going on for years so whatever.
Anonymous
>>4374404 you can find it yourself if you go through their photos. its real
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4374387 Fly somewhere and look out the window
Anonymous
>people ITT too intelligent to stand on a hill or something to confirm the earths curvature
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4374389 the dust is blowing away pretty fast but I agree there should have been at least a little bit on the inside
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>4374381 >how does looking at a ball work Anonymous
this small push in the beginning is appearently enough to leave the moon. no loss of momentum what so ever. considdering this footage the astronauts probably would have been able to just jump off the moon if thats all that is required.
also it seems like the whole thing is swining back and forth a little bit like its beeing pulled up by a rope
>>4374406 fucking mason niggers conspiring the whole world against me REEEEEEEEE
>>4374407 nasa.gov source to the pic is the first link in the OP. silly me thought it would prevent stupid claims about it being fake
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4374410 Oh yea wht abut gobermnen lies? Disprov that curved earther
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4374371 That martian rock is Atlantean (or vice versa)... pic related...
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4374371 you're retarded, hans
Anonymous
>>4374380 easily one of my favorite posts...
Anonymous
>>4374414 Its what they call 'solid fuel' it is neither liquid nor burned, just dry particulate matter. No flame, not much violence, and more than enough to leave the moon. I forget exactly what it is, but escape velocity for the moon is low as fuck.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
pic related is from
https://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00710/mcam/0710MR0030150070402501E01_DXXX.jpg again simply ignored
>>4374413 >implying i didnt write in that post that the distortion should have been the other way around based on the height, giving source for the altitude from which either picture was made fucking read before you shitpost
>>4374419 do you happen to have the nasa source on that?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4374398 I'm not the pasta anon but I'm always in your threads, howdy
Anonymous
>>4374396 Gravity has nothing to do with the shape of the planet.
But why oh why do I take brainlet bait so often :(
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Mods are illuminati confirmed
Anonymous
>>4374423 Christ you're fucking dumb, if the Moon is above you it's going to have a greater gravitational pull on you than if it was on the other side of the earth, how the fuck could the moon orbit the earth if it was flat you fucking filth
Anonymous
!CumBENIS4c
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4374521 globecucks fucking piss me off
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
NASA is planning colonization soon. I visited NASA. I believe you anon
Anonymous
According to mods
Political
>>>/pol/163621431 >>>/pol/163628677 >>>/pol/163630720 >>>/pol/163631804 >>>/pol/163633567 >>>/pol/163634711 >>>/pol/163636484 >>>/pol/163637790 >>>/pol/163637802 >>>/pol/163639002 >>>/pol/163640945 >>>/pol/163641690 >>>/pol/163643130 (and i just skimmed through the lower half of the catalogue of stuff that is online for more than 1 1/2 hours)
not political
A discussion about the deceptiveness of a government agency with sources directly from the agency as well as CIA, news articles and videos
at this point im really just keep doing these threads to show what pieces of shit mods are
Anonymous
>>4374391 >>4374420 >>4374517 >I'm just gonna ignore these posts that dispute my claims. Anonymous
>>4374624 last one wasnt even directed to any of my claims, first one is retarded as i never claimed its humanoid remains that fossilized but a statue, and the one in the middle possibly disproves one claim i made, but not the others.
!CumBENIS4c
Quoted By:
>>4374562 /pol/ is half commie and leftist queers. i keep telling people but they sperg out because reality is toxic to them.
Anonymous
>>4374825 My mistake, I have never seen anyone claim anything other than a fossilised skull on the first one.
Were you not the flat earth yard from earlier? Mistake again.
Anonymous
>>4374905 im saying for months earth is a hollow sphere with nazis living inside or at the entrance of it in antarctica
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/158427484/ Anonymous
>>4375102 Ohhhh I see.
That theory has always struck me as strange. There is a bizarre amount of information on it, which you could argue is reliable given the Nazi effort in science.
I simply struggle to see any possible physics model for it. If the earth was hollow, there wouldn't remotely be enough gravitational pull to hold a mantle together, there would just be no mass. If the gravity was there, say artificial, the mantle would collapse like paper. Say the hollow part was only 100 miles cubed, and you had the strength in the layers above, the heat would be catastrophic.
I just can't see it.
Anonymous
>>4375174 thing is all the equation and modesl in physics are based on the assumption that the earth and the other celestial objects are solid, so obviously those aren aplicable for the hollow earth model. feed scientist wrong info about the state of our planet as well as all the other (for example through NASA and the other spaceagencies), tell them it is solid and the scientist will go figure out the math on how it works. now tell them the earth and the other bodies are hollow and they will figure out the math and principles on how that works too. you just have to make the scientist assume the model you desire and they will try figure out the physics behind it and apply it everywhere else resulting the lie being enforced on its own.
there is also the electrical universe theory claiming that gravity doesnt really exist and is just another aspect of electromagnetism, the van der waals forces espeicially i believe. if that is the case then the hutchison effect
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeUgDJc6AWE basically letting stuff levitate through vibrating an electromagnetic field effecting even non magnetic materials. Now the legends speak of an inner sun, which could cause that hutchison effect naturally locking the crust and the people in its current positions around the inner sun. there is also this fella
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PM5zrzd4pOU talks about how all our celestial bodies are hollow including the sun, which at least seems to be the case on the moon (will go into that in the next post)
There is also the version that there are actually "just" portals at the poles leading to other worlds which make it appear like they are inside our own. all i know is there is something at the poles and they are covering it up
Anonymous
>>4375211 >>4375174 regarding the hollow moon
https://history.nasa.gov/SP-350/ch-12-3.html >They all worked well, with one exception, and were really producing useful data. One unexpected result came from the seismic experiment recording the impact of Intrepid on the surface after we had jettisoned it. The entire Moon rang like a gong, vibrating and resonating for almost on hour after the impact. and while we are at oddities about the moon:
Irwin Shapiro,
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
>“The best possible explanation for the Moon is observational error – the Moon doesn’t exist.’ >"The Moon is bigger than it should be, apparently older than it should be and much lighter in mass than it should be. It occupies an unlikely orbit and is so extraordinary that all existing explanations for its presence are fraught with difficulties are none of them could be considered remotely watertight." Christopher Knight and Alan Bulter
Book: Who Built the Moon?
>The Moon has astonishing synchronicity with the Sun. When the Sun is at its lowest and weakest in mid-winter, the Moon is at its highest and brightest, and the reverse occurs in mid-summer. Both set at the same point on the horizon at the equinoxes and at the opposite point at the solstices. What are the chances that the Moon would naturally find an orbit so perfect that it would cover the Sun at an eclipse and appear from Earth to be the same size? What are chances that the alignments would be so perfect at the equinoxes and solstices? Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4375213 Isaac Asimov,
American author and professor of biochemistry at Boston University and Science Fiction writer. Asimov was one of the most prolific writers of all time.
>"We cannot help but come to the conclusion that the Moon by rights ought not to be there. The fact that it is, is one of the strokes of luck almost too good to accept… Small planets, such as Earth, with weak gravitational fields, might well lack satellites… … In general then, when a planet does have satellites, those satellites are much smaller than the planet itself. Therefore, even if the Earth has a satellite, there would be every reason to suspect… that at best it would be a tiny world, perhaps 30 miles in diameter. But that is not so. Earth not only has a satellite, but it is a giant satellite, 2160 miles in diameter. How is it then, that tiny Earth has one? Amazing. The fist guy actually would rather argue that the moon doesnt exist than to admit it was placed and created by something intelligent (God?)
Anonymous
>>4375211 I don't have the time at the moment but I might come back later.
Gravity is sub-atomic, its a field, it existed long before any celestial bodies formed and they have always been bound by it, the same as all matter. Absolutely no fundamental equations come from bodies, they are lower than that.
I have a little bit of interest in what is at the poles but my starting point would be ice.
I'm open minded though.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4375247 I should quickly add, equations for orbital velocities and the like come from bodies but I would say they are not really fundamental.
Anonymous
Are you the German anon that makes these Nazi UFO, Antarctica and maybe sometimes Hollow Earth threads?
Duke Fucking Nukem !M7duKeNuKM
Duke Fucking Nukem !M7duKeNuKM ID:gjBcnqxj Mon 12 Mar 2018 13:51:33 No. 4375289 Report Quoted By:
RETARDED FLAT EARTHERS ITT
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Gay thread for gay people
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4375247 >Gravity is sub-atomic, its a field, so is electromagnetism
> it existed long before any celestial bodies formed so are charged particles creating electromagnetic fields
However yes, im not sold that gravity is just a form of electromagnetism either, but its an interesting concept at the very least worth considdering
>>4375278 probably the same, didnt se another anon posting about it at least. I actually dont think i have any videos on hollow earth and that stuff, but if you are interested in ancient history and some evidence those people were far more advanced than we care to believe
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L777RhL_Fz4 This one is partly about modern monuments and their meanings too, but at around 1:10:00 he starts talking about the pyramids, and how they encode the size of the earth in relation to the moon, as well as the speed of light with over 99% accuaricy
The second part i sadly didnt watch in full yet.
https://archive.org/details/SecretsInPlainSightVolume2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nUmEbjSoHs this video talks about how different monuments, from the pyramids, to stonehenge, to stuff in south america encode mathematical knowledge as well as functioning as a GPS telling people where they are currently if they know how to read the monuments, again showing that those "cavemen" were far more sophisticated than we care to admit as well as showing that there was some kind of global communication going on (not like the internet, but information where exchanged through traveling, trade or whatever despite southamerica not being discovered officially until thousands years later) since they all use the same system
aside from that i can recomment graham hancock
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5DNvYMtkyk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wJw1DcI2e4 i was recommendet these channels here a few times
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsSI1nsPJukyW5dIs9RytGg https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqLPTe6eEeBP10Zhu5p-0cQ Anonymous
penispenispenispenispenispenispenispenispenispenispenispenispenispenispenispenispenispenispenispenispenispenispenispenispenispenispenis
Anonymous
>>4375320 benisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenisbenis
Anonymous
>>4375330 >>4375320 This is what you people sound like with all of this round earth and fake moon landing stuff
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4375379 Flat earth isnt any better
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4374371 The earth is a 4th dimension dodecohedron
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4374562 Hi German anon, ive been following these threads for a long time, could you please post the link to your discord, thanks.
Anonymous
Was this thread moved from pol?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4377010 Yes, the mods are kikes
