>>6464962Yeah, probably~
I'm only sorry for anybody who likes happy threads and will have to witness possible green spasm attacks (´・ω・｀)
I am free to my thoughts, so why not giving anything to /bant/ in return? It's people's interest that counts.
>>6464986You are talking about 60% of Cirno threads, I'm talking about the rest that actually did something to and for this place.
>Apu is here only to send Cirnofigs into seething rageThen why do they have to destroy anything they touch?
It also doesn't change that Apu is a mass low effort digital art. If you want to fight for board's dominancy, do so with anything that's worth people's attention - and this is only about the picture, not to mention general thread's motive or topic. Show me how many frog threads actually had a one or at least a common sense behind their placement (apart of comfy and a bunch of others, they are coole, just green).
I know that you like Apu and other posters likewise, Rommy, but you are not thinking for most of them. By cropping their shit into /bant/ and calling it being here forever is degenerating, ignorant and absolutely immoral. Pure destructivism, nothing else below or above. You might want to post Apu for your reasons, they post it for their own and believe me, Cirno is merely a pretext.
>Apu isn't as popular as CirnoBecause it (and their posters) 99% of the time can't offer anything interesting. If you wanna, then make a change, I would love to see Apu actually getting into /bant/'s structure by some actually interesting posters, not just a bunch of deviant proxy fags not even knowing how's their parental stuff working.
>but cirnofrens also do this, except on a larger scaleYeah, but when a thread dies with lesser than even 10 replies, it's just bad for the board's quality.
You have a point here.
