>>3542980I doubt for long.
>>3544946I feel like she would be stunned, not sure what to do.
>>3544916That is very much the case I think. Without strong characterization, people just assume her personality to be any number of things, but at the same time a lot of artists "get it right" so to speak in that we see the "same" person. It could also be because she is mostly just a blank slate to project onto
>>3542929Sorry for replying so late, but that's part of the reason I posted.
I could be described as "from /r9k/" just as I once could be described as "from /a/" I just post in those rare places where this love of ours is taken seriously in a real light, and the other board's threads could be called that the majority of the time, but that majority is shrinking, with invisible and visible enemies making attempts at the thread's inhabitants and therefore the entire thread's life it has become harder and harder to post there.
Mods refuse to do their job after having confined any discussion of pygmalionism to a once-a-week ghetto, then finally to exile onto /r9k/ and other even less savory places. They seek a pogrom of this type of discussion, what once could be called up tight and forum-like to now being one of the only sources of genuine conversation on this site. These types of threads are free of external influencers pretending for the sake of an ideology to brainwash users because training can't instill eros or agape into a bad-faith poster, or at least that was once the case.
So they retaliate by doing nothing when the thread is spammed by low-effort trash, impersonators, and all sorts of dedicated sabotage. Many individual actors, none of which are punished, but I got banned for several days for reporting them, which was pretty nice of the mods. Even something as simple as discussion of a delusion is to be made piecemeal and sold off for some semblance of power over another human being. Like bureaucrats they are, they do nothing to better the plight of man.
