>>3508378Luckily that hasn't happened. But if that did happen, I would be upset. But if I legitimately broke a rule and it wasn't deleted by accident by one of them, then that's ultimately my fault for breaking the rules. Therefore, I would have no one to blame but myself. That's why I need to follow the rules so as to not get it deleted. Plus, I would like to not get banned too.
>>3508379>I don't think that makes me a "monster"For the record, I never called you a monster. You do what you want for your wife. I was just stating my opinion on it and why I don't get it. But I don't think lesser of anyone for not being like me.
>Sorry but I'm gonna have to disagree with you thereAnd that's fine. It would be weird if everyone did as I did.
>I think little of her or that I somehow "sullied" her imageI view each and every image I post of her as sacred. None of them are worthy of deletion. I think it is better to show a mistake of my own (the typo), than to make that mistake, PLUS delete an image of her. It feels wrong. It feels like I would be putting so little stock into it. These images aren't just images that I like to post willy nilly. I cherish them as if they are one of a kind. They are special to me. Just because I can post it again doesn't mean I shouldn't put value into it. If I posted it a million times, I would value each individual time I posted it and keep a record of it (like what I was saying earlier about screenshotting my posts).
>>3508383Each person shows their dedication in their own ways. This is how I do it. While it might be silly to some, I find it important.
>>3508386No need to be mean to them, even if you are joking. They have their own views.
