>>3658820>I'd like to get into medium format photographyYou should. IMO it's the only practical format to use if you want to do film at all. While there aren't as many film options, the selection available is enough to suit any need, and the image quality is good enough that it's not completely bested by digital like 35mm is. Scanning 120 is also possible cheaply.
>but it seems rather expensiveMoreso now than when I started back in 2006. At that time The pro film industry using medium format was completely winding down and so the retail outlets were all "we're unloading stock". Now only hobbyists use it, and so the expendables (film and developer) have gone up in price it's true while variety in selection has decreased. The hardware is extremely cheap compared to digital equipment that will give you comparable quality though, especially if you don't sperg out on brand names and go for the Hasselblad or Rollei. For less than $500 you can get hardware, a focal length for every occasion, that will probably keep working for decades. Can't do that with a digital body or the computer-equipped lenses.
>never colour because I've heard that it can go wrong very easilyOnly if you can't pay attention to what you're doing. If you can follow the directions that come with the kit, know how to read a thermometer, then you'll have no issues. Don't get lazy and it's fine.
>Reminds me PatagoniaAstonishing guess. It was probably the peak at these coordinates: -54.819821, -69.844851
