>>1752215Anarchism always devolves into syndicates stealing private property, that's even true for the animal kingdom. In this regard, anarchism can just be seen as informal communism, because absent organized protection of property, those who produce anything are stolen from.
Otherwise, YIMBYs might see it as a "one-time" thing, but it necessarily dilutes the value of private property for "all-time" because such events can't be considered entirely rare or impossible any longer. Ancaps would be able to attack those who try to steal their property. In a pro-YIMBY scenario, they would be arrested, and the state would facilitate the theft, which sounds to me like the leftist activity of ignoring the sovereignty or concept of "private property."
Here's more of NYC having extremely expensive real estate taken up by crime-ridden projects. These, again, can just be reconstructed with more density and help to solve any "housing crisis" or whatever.