>>1790909my yooz are second person: if you see Kay. 1790851 is close, however i would like you to note that again, read the thread, nowhere can be found where i have said "you don't need one"
that is a bastardized interpretation manifested by an assumption of generally applied principles you have sought and found all in your head.
lets go back to what i think is your thing cos im not orthographically tracking but i cant imagine its more than one person so doggedly stubborn at this angle.
x=y=!z
if the consequences of this engagement are unfruitful for your pilgrimage to a satisfactory understanding, then that is not a serious concern to me. that it may stoke your ire i choose to not mince words when i get down to it is of a similar level of concern to me.. feel free to bifurcate or even defenestrate if you get too fired up about something that yet eludes you. rarely do i encounter demanding and durative pursuit of justification; (though futile lol you refuse to accept that which is available for your purveyance at any point) and in what seems to be good faith. i am both refreshed and amused
again, i am typically meticulous in my use of language. i am, of course, prone to stray from what i may describe or prescribe, as much as anyone may, it is subjective anyway. however, i refuse to remanufacture my organic narrative to cater to the accessibility standards of others, selfishly, especially when my words are on the line and it seems like nobody will take off their glasses. my intent is to express for clairvoyance. your capacity to engage with the dialogue you prompted is not my responsibility.
with these considerations in mind, i remain reflective of a record clearly adherent to my consistent position, repeated ad nauseam, out of grasp somehow?
>>1790914bro get on some next level shit, and like, let go of letting go mkay? lol
>>1790951cheers desu
