>>4275775>In comparison to rock/leaf guy it is a good composition>setting the bar this fucking lowngmi lmao
For real though: reading the rest of the discussion you can see the other guy is a moron
Yeah the dog shot is good, the eyes are in focus yadda yadda whatever
Even the ducks' photo is good
Just don't push this whole
>Can we please try our best to post images with good composition?This
>>4275639 is not good composition
Especially not because of
>>4275669 this nonsense
It's three ducks in a line
There's no swirly path, the ducks are not aligned with the fantasy lines you made up to pretend it all fits in a rule of thirds that makes no sense and a swirly path perspective that only exists in your head
But the photo IS COOL
Of course I love good composition, but the "rules" are just guidelines, way less strict than you're making them up to be to the point of negating reality to justify that your photo has a great composition and, through that, get the approval from anonymous people online
You'll also be more satisfied with your own photos when you realize that you can even have nice photos that don't have a very good composition
Despite being a moron
>>4275686 this post specifically is absolutely right in everything
But still the photo is nice.