>>4279922>and I would not say that they are "made"I don't get caught up on terminology, I don't think that matters at all
why would you say so tho?
>>4279953>everything is compositionally uninteresting>Everything is center frameI opted to shoot photos 2, 3 and 4 as centered and balanced as possible in reference to how catholic figures were almost always portrayed (at least all the way through the XV th century) since around the VII th century
>and there's very little contrast or anything that you would want for black and whiteYes, unfortunately those 3 photos were shot on colour film (Ektar), and while they came out nice in colour I thought that BW suited them best
(apart from those, every other photo is in their native 'form' – colour or black and white)
>Light in >>4279897 (You) is on the flowers, why?'cause I don't control the fucking Sun?
the hell do you want me to do about this?
also there's no way to "just shoot at golden hour bruh" because the cemetery closes relatively early. I was there in the afterhours, actually
>I'm sure something great could be done with Christ and the cross the his rear instead of just snapping the same perspective that anyone would get just going there themselves.Did they, though? Did anyone go to the cemetery after a thunderstorm? Hypothetical conjectures about "if someone else were there they would do the same" isn't criticism, it's speculation
>>4279954>just the crosswalk in frame>really long lens to get almost an orthographic viewthis would be nice indeed
I'll try to do it with a 300mm lense, thanks for the suggestion
