>>4458754True facts about pinhole, but, you can also pinhole on digital or pinhole on a smartphone.
To be clear pinhole with fine grain B&W film is what's great. If it gets processed or fed through phone bullshit then things change.
Kek at the loaner cam+tripod yeah retards don't know how to use cameras. Kids these days will try tapping a screen on a DSLR even if it's not a touchscreen DSLR.
To answer the guy's question though, yeah, give someone who knows how to use both and they'll always produce a better photo with a real camera.
>>4458752>Now give them a pinhole camera. Are you saying now they can't physically produce art because they're using a pinhole camera?Pinholes are fine.
If you set up good lighting or a scene, anything of good quality has the potential to capture art.
Denoising, high pass filtering, AI enhancing, and digital zoom/upscaling invalidate all attempts.
28 Days Later is a nice movie, but the cameras were fucking shit. Nobody likes the way the movie looks. Everyone saying that they do are lying or have been gaslit into consuming copium. It was literally produced at 360p, below standard def TV that even music videos were shot at or scanned at even 40 years ago.
>Which concepts?That photography itself isn't art, and equipment matters. No you can't fix it in post.
If you try to use photography in an artistic way nobody cares unless you have the right gear AND good subjects.
The "art" behind photography would be set design, lighting, timing, and traveling to get perfect angles of nature's beauty, or a good angle of a whore for porn. Your phone snapshits aren't art. Never will be.
>The fact that you said something like that just shows you have only followed bad Instagram accounts if you have ever used this platform, or you just know the modern version of Instagram. Also the concept of someone never having used Instagram. Fucking lmao at you zoomies.
>Again, check out @02q or @mattfrench just to give a couple of examples there.No thanks.
