>>4422807>Even micro four turds is good enough these daysI've owned it, and it still sucks, it's near-phone without $$$$ in glass. MFT sensors did not really improve in IQ until the FF sized and FF priced G9II, and it's not even keeping up with a crop sensor fuji unless you buy premium lenses for it. 4/3 is a very sad cope system full of coping birdwatching/bugwatching autists that were too good for APS-C cameras that "only" shoot at 15fps. Ironically it's a small sensor that attracts the gearfags in this case, lured in by meaningless specs like stills FPS and video crop factors.
>but why overpay and carry all that weightFull frame isn't that expensive or that heavy, it's actually hard to tell it from other cameras in use unless you get into hypersharp pro zooms and superfast primes, and the same price if you buy a generation earlier (meaningless specs like FPS stay the same or go down, color, shading, sharpness, and noise get better). It'll handle deep crops, challenging close-up action, and wide swings in light levels a lot better. Also wildly different colored lights can be corrected better as long as you don't buy a sony.
> if you're not a professional?the idea that only professionals can have nice things is marxist/cuckold BS. Any successful adult with a job can have nice things. You don't have to earn a nice toy by being good with it. You already earned it with your paycheck. Get out of that "teenager begging mommy for a new guitar" mindset.
Full frame does bloat quick for sports and wildlife, and that's negligible because sports and wildlife are boring and meaningless genres where quality doesn't really matter, framing is everything, and every camera is obnoxiously big no matter what so you might as well save yourself the pain and buy the cheapo canon crop setup.
For hobbyists,
Travel, lifestyle, family, art, side gigging = FF Canikon, maybe Fuji
That's too big for me! = Ricoh GRIII/X
Sports and wildlife = Crop sensor canon
