>>4133805>user errorwanted a 20mm, it was either ancient and kind of shit and $400 or newer over $1000 for a 21mm, and this cheaper sony 20mm is better anyways
wanted a 40mm, there was only an ancient kind of shit meme 43mm for over $300
the 70-200's focus breathing at close focusing distances sucks
kind of disappointed with IQ from the tamron 24-70, just don't like it
don't like the colors that much
pentax k1 AF can't into subjects moving towards the camera, would be almost okay with catch in focus but you have to turn of back button focus to use it, and the AF/MF switch on the body also disables CIF. you need an AF/MF switch on the lens, or quick shift and a little focus ring/half press dance to use it. pentax doesn't put these on every lens. it should work with the body in MF mode right? nope. AF tracking on canon and nikon DSLRs is a lot better anyways.
live view was a joke. focus peaking made the histogram/highlight alert useless.
pentax hates aperture rings now for some reason and their aperture ring placement is awkward to begin with
magic "3d pop" with pentax lenses doesn't exist, no one with an opinion worth caring about has pointed it out.
tldr if it were a canon or nikon DSLR it probably would have worked out better but sony is cool too and this was $600 for 420 megapenors
>>4133802thanke.
>center dog>paw out of frame>get whole dog in frame>dog off center>moving camera around>ground is ice, slip a little>dog walks offfug
