[12 / 2 / 5]
i've been wondering how to categorize the progression of cmos in mirrorless, starting with canon and fuji.
some boneheads say "better low light bc larger pixel pitch lol" and some say "higher resolution means obviously better in low light teehee"
what's actually correct seems to be the tuning of the sensor/pixel readout. according to photonstophotos, the best value (in my budget) cameras seems to be eos r and x-s10. even though the x-s10 sensor is bsi and newer than the 30mp sensor, that old sensor captures lower light (iso can be cranked higher) with similar noise by at least 1 stop (12800 in x-s10 vs 25600 in eos r), and dynamic range is similar at 12800 in photonstophotos experiments.
my point is- cmos tech has NOT changed much since the 5d iv, probably even before that if you look at x-t2 vs x-t3/x-s10 dynamic range.
what exactly is holding up sensors/pixels reading higher dynamic range? where can i read some eli5/tldr level research?
some boneheads say "better low light bc larger pixel pitch lol" and some say "higher resolution means obviously better in low light teehee"
what's actually correct seems to be the tuning of the sensor/pixel readout. according to photonstophotos, the best value (in my budget) cameras seems to be eos r and x-s10. even though the x-s10 sensor is bsi and newer than the 30mp sensor, that old sensor captures lower light (iso can be cranked higher) with similar noise by at least 1 stop (12800 in x-s10 vs 25600 in eos r), and dynamic range is similar at 12800 in photonstophotos experiments.
my point is- cmos tech has NOT changed much since the 5d iv, probably even before that if you look at x-t2 vs x-t3/x-s10 dynamic range.
what exactly is holding up sensors/pixels reading higher dynamic range? where can i read some eli5/tldr level research?
