Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.
[316 / 66 / 58]

/m43/ - test chart general

No.4257996 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
MFT is better for lowlight than foolframe. I present you the so called low light "king". MFT has at least 6 stops of IBIS advantage over the "king" and is far sharper than foolframe in low light with much better dynamic equivalence. Its not even funny of how much of a difference there is.
>muh equicalence
WRONG. f/2.8 is f/2.8 and gives the same exposure but even false equivalence fags CANT ignore the minimum 4 stop advantage has over the "king" (lol) of low light even when they take their lies into account.

Just accept it - MFT is simply better, its fine if you dont use the best gead but stop lying to pretend your camera isnt the best - if it isnt MFT it doesnt even have a chance of being the best