>>4275224>absolute cheapest setupm43 aren't really cheaper, but maybe the lenses are???
Full frame. The most amazing deal rn is the z6 (not mark ii). They can be had for $750, and are a real competitor to the S5 and a7iii, which are $1000. The Z6 has incredibly good lowlight performance (S5, S1, a7iii, a7s (all versions)) competitive (for PHOTOS, i don't video, I am not a homosexual).
APSC. The Z50 is another amazing deal at $550. The Z50 has top tier lowlight performance in photos. It doesn't have a big buffer, so it's not the mirrorless d500, however.
You may see criticisms of the af. The af is better than the once super-pro 1DX. So people are nitpicking.
What's lacking in the Z6 and Z50 is buffer, which you will find in "pro" bodies, which usually means "sports photo" bodies.
There are also high megapixel bodies. Don't let the yooo tubbies fool ya, IF you are comparing equally outfitted and process equivalent sensors and circuitry, then higher mp =....somewhat... lower lowlight capability. There are reasons, the reasons are very boring. No, the a7Siii (note the S, and donate to my growing penis) isn't a good comparison to the a7R line, the a7Siii has an advanced system of binning, which is FINE, it's a cinema camera for faggots who do that sick shit, like those faggots who filmed faggotry in the Capitol, now there's an insurrection for you, more like an inesrt-DICK-tion
