>>9974664>And retail only wants named characters, and companies still have to make money on shit when it's not a guaranteed seller. Like Crash Bandicoot. Dipshit.So retail was wrong for not understanding what people wanted, and NECA were wrong for not trying hard enough to convince them otherwise.
>Nope. Sorry it hurts your feelings that NECA did a good job with Crash.Nope. Sorry it hurts your feelings that your favourite company did a shit job with Crash.
>Didn't know we were dealing with a 3rd grader here, that explains a lot.No really, you're claiming because I like figures you don't, I have a "fucked up state of mind".
>Nope.Yep.
>Imagine not having an actual argument and all you can do is fall back on your shitposting.Are you seriously claiming a NECA toy is even remotely on par with a Hot Toys figure?
>And when the purpose of the toy IS accuracy, no, there isn't more to a toy than that. Retard.A toy is a toy. If you want pure accuracy at the expense of everything else buy a statue or a model kit.
>Why don't you ask Todd since he did the same thing, and didn't even give people the option of having a screen accurate version. Or any of the statue makers, or even, look at that Hot Toys.Yep, and they're all wrong too.
>Suck it up. NECA's the only one that even did a completely movie accurate version when all is said and done.Why didn't they take the opportunity to do the "right" version first then?
>Ash didn't look retarded, so the argument stands. Your letting your autism cloud everything you say.He does look retarded though. LOOK AT THIS SHIT. It SUCKS.
>No you're not.Yes, I was. Don't be dumb.
>There's more out there, but there are very few that hold a candle to them. So you're wrong again.In terms of being fragile, gummy, poorly made shite? I guess?