>>9459571>>9459663>EVERYTHING YOU LIKE IS SHIIIIT AND YOURE DUMB AND YOU'RE SHIT AND AND AND AND AND AND NO UUU!!!!Never ceases to amaze me that you guys take criticism and techniques toylines use so personally.
>You are absolutely nitpicking if you're whining about this yet defending disgusting murky washes.At least I'm not making retardedly giant blanket claims.
My last comparison was with the Mafex Spiderman which is relatively clean and how higher quality (read: more expensive figures) figures will fix any issues. Hence preferring the wash on it over something like the Figuarts that uses panel lining that is more obviously flawed.
Even then, lower end figures are still relatively clean as well, so you're not only hypocritcal by nitpicking but also showing how grossly ignorant you are of the toys you're trying to criticize.
> there are less chances to fuck up than applying paint, then a tampo, then a sticker.And my point was is that ALL MASS MANUFACTURED toys will have flaws, including panel line, tampoed, spray masked and stickered figures. Pretty retarded to say "washes should be banned" just because there might be flaws, like saying "dont even try unless it's 100%." As we've seen from panel line figures and even tampographs, they're just as likely to be flawed as well (if compared to like to like, like higher end toys that spend more money on QC).
>Sounds like someone's mad that Figuarts faces are the way forwards, which is why Hasbro have started copying the technique for Black Series.Hasbro copied DCC's technique. Only Bandai seems to rely entirely on the sticker print to act as the complete paint app for the face. Hasbro, DCC, McFarlane, Mafex, and even Mattel are using the sticker for accents (shadows, highlights, etc) while keeping spray masks and tampographs. As seen with Figma's latest samurai guy, you can see that even higher end figures can have the sticker misapplied (printer error?).
See Maul figure ^ for how tampos are commonly misplaced