>>9463196>We've literally been talking about the end result the whole timeRemember when you were lying that that Jazwares don't do washes, after you backpedaled from claiming washes looked like sandpaper?
>Clean/minimalistic paint is generally preferable>Where are washes considered miminalistic or clean? A wash in itself is supposed to be dirty.Washes are not minimalist and are in fact messy, because that is their
nature. Two fold. Minimalist is "flat" like a cheapo Bandai vinyl toy.
Looking back, i love how you call washes gloppy, yet dry brushes aren't, despite the fact that dry brushing is even messier than washes. You can't really wipe that shit in mass manufactured toys.
>Looking at the literal chunk of garbage in the OPOh look, more ignoring because you need to ignore everything else to have a point.
>once again you miss the point. The colours themselves, be they shaded or otherwise, are flatYou're being retarded and don't understand what FLAT means. A cartoon can be flat. No shading. No washes/textures. No highlights. No nothing. One single color per area. Most cartoons are not flat. Flat is Shin Chan or Powerpuff Girls. A low budget 70s look. YEah, you might get scenes where they spend the money to add more colors and details, but they're designed to be flat.
A toy that is FLAT is Robot Damashii, early 90s Toy Biz shit, and most Mattel products. No shading. No washes. No hightlights. Nothing but pure low budget, low effort paint. If you actually want to copy that look, it's no longer flat, because you need to add details to a 3d figure to make it look flat.
>I wouldn't know,Yep, as you've proven many times in this thread, you do speak out of ignorance and it's why you sound so retarded.
>LMAOWhy laugh when you can literally see how little effort and money they put into their toys? Lots of companies put more effort, but you have to pretend every one of those companies are shit, because hopefully you're a paid marketer and not just poor fanboy.
