>>9885249>>9885324Can never trust the ones running Lego right now. Here we have a Sopwith Camel in all its glory, a British biplane fighter that saw service in WW1 with a total number of 1294 kills from all pilots who flew that aircraft. Supposedly the founder of Lego forbade war vehicles because he went through WWII. If going by that logic then the Sopwith Camel should never have been made because WWII is just a terrible sequel to WWI, but of course they'll defend the decision by saying it's out of service, a museum piece and commemorating history. Wait, commemorating history? Does this mean WWII vehicles is now on the table and soon in a few years the Korean and Vietnam war vehicles because they're part of history too? The logic is just blowing my mind.