>>54609862>This is funny. Most people that don't think about this DO have objective measures of quality of art. If you ask a normalfag whether lag and glitches are subjectively or objectively bad, he'll say they're objectively bad things. Because no developer wants their game to run like shit.I love glitches they make RBY 100x more fun that those game should be
>It's like how we can all agree "The Room" is an objectively bad movie because it entirely, categorically, failed what it was trying to do. But when you get into specifics, especially about stories and character, everyone clams up with "art is subjective aaaaaah stop discussing it".never watched it, only saw clips of it, and I found it funny, seems good enough to me
>If you think that Hoenn's water is "shit no matter how artistic it is", then you're not far from realizing this. Because you're right, the metaphor for Hoenn's land/sea divide didn't justify the same-y water routes, battles and pokemon for half the game. The only thing left to figure out is that this is a real, measurable flaw, and not just an opinion. And yes, it is objective.some people love it, just like some people love Lillie, are they retarded? yes, but doesn't change the fact in their perception its good
>Diantha or Lance (can't say Leon). A bad champion ruins the game more than this bitch does imo, because ruining the finale of the game also makes it feel much less structurally cohesive and enjoyable as a whole. And I mean this both in gameplay (they're made too easy and their teams are shit) and in personalities (Diantha literally doesn't feel like a champion, Lance is a boring rehash).I love Diantha and Lance, Lance specially is my third favorite champion, losing only to Gary and Alder, I could go on and on about how he is based and kino but I won't bother because that's not what this thread is about, I never got the hate for Diantha either, she looks good, and her team is cool, her character is cool too, could have said Geeta
