>>40918026>I don't like it so it's not content >>40917925>>pokemon isn't about pokemon once there's a lot of pokemonThere is not as much of a demand for pokemon when you already have hundreds of them. Pic related
>i agree, but remember that graphics were the excuse that gamefreak themselves gave us for the dex cut.And the graphics look amazing for a pokemon game. What's your point? Also you're ignoring that there were multiple reasons meaning that "graphics" only accounts for 100 or so mons being removed. Not all.
>what did he mean by this?Playable gyms never existed to begin with.
>>I WANTED megas removed because I'm bad at the game!They were the worse things to happen to pokemon. Too much powercreep, 90% of the deisgns were too cluttered to be worth something and the lore for it was retarded
>>I don't WANT a battle frontier! I don't WANT content that everyone else obviously wants!I didn't say this. I said it's absurd to demand this for a first version game
>prove it. we have seen the routes, the game is precisely linear. denying the truth doesn't make it false.Wild area alone. Also we haven't seen if you can play the gyms out of order which would actually determine how linear the games are
>what did he mean by this?Routes like gen 3 dont make sense 3d. Roads are the way to go. If you want to explore more, there's a wild area
>what did he mean by this?Whether they are good or not doesn't change if they are content or not.
