>>44717700>It's there, and I'm not the only one who picked up on it, which is why the other anons have been ridiculing you all day, apparently.First of all, you didn't "pick" it up. Even if we were to assume the hints are there, everyone got it from the movie and "connected the dots".
>Are you referring to their cameos in Yellow?For instance, which carried over to LG
> it doesn't interfere with the plot - or the subtext -They're actually the first ones that directly mention Fuji did some experiments in the main games, in Let's Go. They meddle with the "subtext"(which stops being subtext at that point).
> It's irrelevant to the conversation.>Prove the anime influenced the games>anime characters in the games are irrelevant to the conversationAnd then I'm the one ignoring evidence.
>They aren't directly,Then you can't claim something was in the games solely because it was in the anime. It's that simple.
>The journals use 'we' quite often, if I recall.Look up わたし.
>He outright tells Red to keep quiet about receiving the only prototype Master Ball in existence specifically because he knows Giovanni still wants the damn thing.But what he tells Red is that people might want it not mentioning Giovanni. It COULD hint to Giovanni ONLY if the president wanted to hide his existence from Red(which would already be an assumption) but makes no sense because Red fought Giovanni RIGHT THERE. If that quote was meant to tell the player Giovanni wanted it he should have said so directly. Not because subtext isn't a thing, but because it's not consistent with the events we do see take place.
