>>44717734>First of all, you didn't "pick" it up. Even if we were to assume the hints are there, everyone got it from the movie and "connected the dots".I reached my conclusion from playing the damn game, long before the movie aired here. I wasn't the only one, either - it's all we would talk about on the playground with other kids my age. Don't make assumptions.
>For instance, which carried over to LGWhich means what, exactly? They aren't interfering with the plot or the subtext in any way - they're replacing a few nameless grunts, but filling their roles exactly the same.
>They're actually the first ones that directly mention Fuji did some experiments in the main games, in Let's Go. They meddle with the "subtext"(which stops being subtext at that point).
But that doesn't interfere at all? I'm not sure what you're trying to get at here.
>Prove the anime influenced the games>anime characters in the games are irrelevant to the conversation>And then I'm the one ignoring evidence.They're irrelevant because they're fulfilling the exact same role that a few generic NPCs did in the originals without altering the subtext. Why don't you understand that? Nothing changed, so bringing them up means nothing.
>Then you can't claim something was in the games solely because it was in the anime. It's that simple.I didn't, though. The anime came later, and expanded on the games, which were the source material, not the other way around. Then Yellow came out as a 'revision', and continue to expand on the subtext. You really aren't getting this.
>Look up わたし.Can mean 'I' or 'we' depending on context. Context here implies it's a 'we'.
>But what he tells Red is that people might want it not mentioning Giovanni.Giovanni has many spies -including the ones you literally JUST FOUGHT in Sliph Co. The scientist is warning you that anyone could be working for Team Rocket, so be careful. That obviously flew over your head, though, along with everything else.
