>>28251194>What do you think of object-mons in general?They vary from being really lame to really good. All in all, though, I feel like people are way too harsh on
the ones that aren't from Gen 7.
>Hoping for more in gen VIIConsidering how shitty the ones we've seen so far are, I hope not.
>Which ones are your favorites?The Honedge line are my favorite pokemon over all. I'm not sure what it is exactly, I just think they look nice, especially Aegislash. I also really love Cofagrigus, Chandelure, and Garbodor.
>Which are your least favorites?The ones from Gen 7. They're just fucking awful.
>Uhh, a lei, because there are leis in Hawaii.>Uhh, a sandcastle, because there are sandcastles in hawaii.It's like if they made a beret pokemon, or an Eiffel Tower pokemon.
>B-But they're not as bad as the other ones!They're literally the most unoriginal object-mons besides MAYBE Litwick, but even then, Litwick actually evolves into something interesting.On the other hand, the Lei one is just a Lei with a vague leafy orb on it, and the sandcastle is just a sandcastle with two tiny tiny dots in it. If you erased the eyes, there'd be literally no difference between it and a regular sandcastle.
>Do you use any on your main team?Aegislash all day, man.
Also, shouldn't Gavalugg be on there too? If its prevo counts as an object because it's based on icicles, it should count as an object because it's based on an iceberg. Also, I don't know if Carbink/Geodude/Muk should be on there; natural elements that are alive are very different from man-made objects that are alive.