>>53898299Ofc, you never actually kill them, because then you're just as much in the wrong as they are. You just hurt them, badly. You hurt them to the point where the get the message, and are intimidated to not do what was done to them on others.
If they are truly narcissistic, they won't get the lesson "Ah, so this is how others feels when I do this to them" because again, they literally lack the mental ability to do so, because they are sick and broken. However, they'll learn the lesson of "I should stop doing this action, if I don't want this to happen to me again."
Ofc, this changes drastically depending on their victim. If its a child, or an old person, and if they committed senseless murder, not many people are going to be too upset if you hurt them to a point where they cannot walk, speak, see, hear anymore. If the person raped/killed a child, you have a moral obligation to hurt that person immensely to the point where they can not recover, and to continue hurting them to teach them the lesson of "Oh, so this is how it feels" or "I'll never do that again."
I don't advocate killing a sinner, because that misses out on the education of the rod. I am advocating however that you should, and must strike the sinner many many many times until they fucking understand, and in some scenarios, strike them so hard that they can not harm others ever again.