>>37593368Nah, it doesn't make sense to have the same exact 151 + any cross-evolutions spread out across every region, but I would definitely welcome a quality-over-quantity approach that fleshes out existing pokémon and makes their recurrence from game to game not a bad thing as it automatically is to so many people on /vp/. When you want to forget about something as soon as the games are done because the constant shoveling of new mons is practically the only noteworthy content in every new game, that's fucked up, and things shouldn't be that way.
I'd more than happily take a game like what
>>37594067 wants if they add some real depth and personality to the 200 mons we get. New forms, colorations, proper animation, high quality battles, virtual pet bullshit, the whole deal.
