>>38255826Win what exactly? I was never arguing. Just defending an anon with literal facts. Google "what things were like before internet" or "things the internet ruined" or something similar and see what comes up. Literally, hundreds of people talking about not having internet or having shitty dial-up etc. as late as 2002. It was really common back then. Also, I don't care about proving whether or not I was poor; I don't fucking know you, and so what if I WAS poor when I was 11. I'm not poor NOW, so what's the point, kid?
>>38255841>>38255868You do know I wasn't the anons you two were originally talking to, right? I just stepped in to try and make a point. I had the internet back then and barely used because I was more outdoors-y back then. I knew loads of people more well-to-do than my family in my middle-class suburban town who just flat-out didn't have internet. I knew some kids who had it but weren't allowed to use it. I knew some who had it but barely used. etc.
