>>41824977Copypasted /meat/bro's answer on gc
1. Agree on /jidf/
2. Agree on /wvt/
3. Agree on /pkg/
4. We should make a mock session to field test this. See if it works.
I do agree we need to test this first. Let's do it with a fictional non-canon scenario so that there shouldnt be any actual bias. In theory.
>>41825048>more than one loremasteri believe it's more of as an hierarchy of reference if there are multiple people of the same thread. since most of us are solo it wouldnt affect much.
>decisioons for canon always were meant to be weighted by knowledge of a thread by peopleBUT it will be great for collabs and cross-thread projects. we all have lurk on more than one thread. and some of us have seen stuffs the others havent when we lurked there. Like, I was there for a while in /clg/ and i like to check up on kronies in /inf/. this system can be a legitimacy check when we pool our ideas.
>>41825138REALLY?!? THAT WAS JUST SARCASTIC CONDESCENDING CHAN SPEAK!
