>>29558118I'm talking about why it is that shit to begin with.
>wtf are you taling aboutLook at the sticky there. 99% of "discussion" that occurs in that shithole doesn't meet the criteria of quality stickied in the fucking first page. That + flood of normalfags killed what was left of that place.
It's such a disgrace that I am forced to assume bad faith from some party.
>>29558230I saw that video, it was funny.
Bold of you to assume no one else is doing such a thing.
See all the
>1 post by this ID
threads. Why would a human do that?
>>29558563Yep