>>21801016>the point is how convenient it is to post in the chatThe thread has more positive points that outweigh the convenience of the global chat.
>Do I really need to make my post extravagant or come up a way to make my simple question more engaging to get a answer?A good point. I'd help if I knew the answer, but sometimes I don't feel qualified to. I'm not going to call you stupid, since I'm not that smart either. In my head it'd be easier for a global post to be ignored, but I guess I'm wrong.
> even wait for 50s if I want to add more info on my first post or to replyJust think your posts out before you make them. That is simple, take some time to think before you act.
>It's just the oldfag nostalgia you're holding very dearlyNo, I mean the things you can do in the thread. The unique interactions, the culture, images, videos, all of that. You don't get much of that in the chat. It feels dead in comparison. Lifeless.
I think the global chat started out a symptom of an issue, but now it's become a huge detriment to the health of the thread. Is it irreversible? No, probably not, and that's awful. Some have gotten used to it, some haven't. There's a real split, a split that didn't need to exist. You know what originally caused this problem? People moaning about avatars and offtopic. If people wouldn't have bitched about those types of things every single thread, the global chat would have never existed. It was a mistake, born out of fatigue. It shouldn't have needed to happen, but some people just refused to shut up.
