>>69584770>>69589768I am beginning to theorize that Niji PR must have a mandated tweet policy that goes like this:
>I want you to make this tweet. You can either:>1. Use this pre-written tweet>2. Make your own tweet using the crucial bits of the pre-written tweet>3. Make your own tweet that pushes the message we want pushed.Vivi went with No.3, and Fulgur has consistently went with No.3. I feel that if it's something livers actually want to tweet, or in Fulgur's likely something they want actual individual control over, they choose No.3. If it's something they really don't care about enough for the effort, or if it's something they actually don't want to tweet, they do No.1 or No.2. With that in mind, I have to wonder how many mandated tweets there has actually been. There may have been more that the public has not caught on to. Perhaps, in early days, they less strict about when and how the message pushed. Plus, they were likely positive things that livers in a better headspace, wouldn't mind pushing. But with things as they are now, PR is getting sloppy desperate, pushing the livers to get it out there NOW NOW NOW without realize it how much more fake the "solidarity" looks.
On a side note, I give some respect Fulgur and Vivi for choosing authenticity, even if they bent the knee. I can respect "owning it". Though I don't know what Vivi was think when picking a fight with that nobody. If you're doing a PR stunt, why the FUCK don't you understand that generating positivity is propping up good things, and attempting to destroy things invites negativity? Especially in an industry of artists and entertainers, in which you are seen to be in a position of prestige and power? And are currently playing at a PR disadvantage due to recent events within the past year? STOP ANTAGONIZING PEOPLE IN PUBLIC.
