>>7346108>>7339455>Windows = ugly and retarted>>7340664>Windows = good compromise between form and function, gave examples how it can be customized without any third party programsThis is where the argument about desktops ended, because your NPC programming activated because somebody said something positive about Windows. Even though all the guys on /g/ agree with you.
I'll prove to you that you're caught in group-think. From the get-go you made degrading claims such as that Windows users have no place in desktop threads. You also tried to display elitism by claiming to either belong to a crtain group or that I do not belong. See
>>7345851>claim that I only used Windows and an appeal to ricist purity.>>7345865>an appeal to ricing culture. Without giving an actual reason for its supposed superiority besides being a separate group.>another attempt to shun outsiders and their perspectives as not belongingYou give opinions, feeling based judgements and claim group authority instead of arguments. In four or so posts you've not come up with one point that does not boil down to something you've heard others say. The others in this case being Anons from /g/.
>>7346108>normieThe background of an argument is irrelevant on 4chan. Even if I am a normie, my point still stands.
>A corrected anecdoteThe car stood for the OS, not the ricing of ones desktop. No, you haven't designed your OS.
>share and rate each others' hard worked-on ricesThese "hard worked-on" rices are mostly shit and boil down to matching colours. They're horrible from a design perspective as functionality suffers. I've given my opinion on that already.
>tl;drYou're of above average intelligence, interested in a niche hobby. Thus you eschew mainstream opinions. But as you are "only" above average, you are missing the ability to formulate your own and have thus merely exchanged mainstream opinions with the prevailing group-think of your peers. You remain a passive consumer and repeater, faggot
