>>7685419>1440likely not, typically those structures are picked out through wavelengths that may not be visible to the naked eye. Additionally they may be shifted, obscured, or blocked out entirely by intercepting bodies. They may also be added digitally after the fact, to replicate the wavelengths at which the object was observed. Typically these images are almost like collages from long exposure times, so we kind of start with 1's and 0's and snag data out of that, the image we (as non-professional astronomers/astrophysicists) enjoy are kind of neat little byproducts.
