>>7913723>>7924531Because a wallpaper should be more vague, indirect, & atmospheric; something not too distracting, serving more as “background art” than fine art typically does. Having figures in it gives it a subject, a prominent focal point, & becomes distracting in the process. Case in point: most wallpaper threads about paintings are usually landscape art.
And a lot of us just don't like human figures in something like a wallpaper and are kinda sick of how ornamental women are.
“Look at this boring uncreative image that happens to have a pretty girl in it. Isn't that wonderful!? 10/10 image, am I right?”
No, retard.
