>>8002023svg certainly has its uses, that's quite true, but it's just never widely caught on, either as a desktop pape format or for general online use (outside of graphics images posted to wikipedia articles for example) for whatever reason, perhaps because it's a lossless scalable vector graphics format (i.e. made up of lines and shapes) rather than a traditional raster format (i.e. made up of individual pixels) like .jpg, .gif, and .png all are.
>>8002024Oh for sure, QR codes in particular are both quite fascinating as a subject, and are a hugely powerful means of communicating a large amount of data in a single image, particularly because they're essentially infinitely scaleable in size and also because the error correction built into the QR format means you can lose quite a sizeable percentage of the QR code, compared to other older barcode formats, and yet still recover the entire encoded dataset.
Also, I'll type my replies however I want thank you very much.
Just because some portion of the internet are apparently either too fucking lazy and/or just too poorly educated to properly format their replies in a clearly readable manner rather than simply dumping an impenetrable wall of text on-screen, doesn't mean I should have to relax my own standards of writing to suit their inadequacies.
