>>17504992>CNN is rightNow you need to post a non-CNN source that you googled just now that confirms what CNN said even though they are just reporting whatever CNN reported and not independently verifying it.
A cultural practice so profound in it's idiocy that it takes more to unpack just how retarded the practicioner is for wasting his, and the victim's (me) time.
1. CNN is completely useless. If everything CNN says needs to be verified by another source then we don't need CNN, we can just rely on other sources.
2. Confirmation bias, you're not testing whether CNN is telling the truth, you're presuming they are and looking for evidence to support your prejudice.
3. The corruption is now so endemic that even with a second source to verify, the very fact that it's agreeing with CNN on something actually makes the second source suspect by association.
Now I'm not clicking on that article because it's clickbait, just like everything else CNN publishes, but I can have a pretty good guess at what's in it. A few grains verisimilitude, things that sound like the could be true, around which is grown a shiney pearl of bullshit to support a preheld yet increasingly absurd narrative that you are still clinging too because it is a human flaw that it is easier to trick a man, than to convince a man he has been tricked.
And this, dear OP, is why nobody is taking the OP seriously. It's not that we disagree with your opinion or your assement of the facts, it's that you are a babbling psychopath yelling nonsense at imaginary opponents. Leading to the fourth and most interesting point.
4. Anyone who takes CNN seriously, is not to be taken seriously.