>>8943852>your writing style is awfully familiar to that of a certain mason shill.Ok, how? Explain. The post you are referencing uses:
-greentext (an element common to any user who's been here more than a month)
-"boomer" (an element common to any user who's been here more than a month)
-"r_td" (an element common to any user who's been here more than a month)
I'm really not sure how any of what I typed is "unique" enough that you could single me out as one other person on this site. I believe you are just grasping.
Secondly, how do you KNOW this other person is a "freemason shill"? A common trope of newfaggots is that they just start calling people they disagree with "jew/freemason/leftypol shill" without explaining why, or giving any evidence to support their assertion. For example in the past, you would only call somebody else "a jew" here if they consistently acted jewish in a thread:
-not really participating (pilpul)
-pushing anti-goy & anti-white positions
-baiting
-trying to derail important threads with bullshit
You would not do this just because they disagreed on something. Did this other anon admit to being a freemason, and if not, what makes you so sure he was one?