>>9827749Why does it seem like this AI is just poorly reconstructing images of sets or mocs it found on the internets?
And why does every face have cancer?
>>9827815The VP of Design is a groomer.
The pandering this month was guaranteed to happen and it's really unfortunate they have an anniversary milestone coinciding with such a month.
Also, you have fuckwits like this
>>9826282 to thank for enabling Lego's pandering.
Perhaps Lego is figuring out parents don't want such people near their kids, and that's why they're pushing R18 sets so hard. I'm not sure if they're even trying to have kids growing up fond of their childhood toys anymore. Like they're close to the last stage of a long-term strategy but forgot to keep the start of it active.