>>4217420>sovla word for the visually illiterate and the visually illiterate only
if someone says this without a hint of mockery in their voice it is a sure sign they are not and will never be a good photographer or a good anything - except maybe a "computer" "programmer" (javascript copy/paste)
>>4217427no, we need more of them.
>>4217905but not this kind. FFS, good photographers have shot entire weddings on a 50mm prime, maybe a 28mm on standby. you don't need 3 bodies with the "holy trinity of zooms", that's pure marketing babble for people who all take the exact same pictures, literally the event photography equivalent of IF YOU ARE NOT SHOOTING "STREET" WITH LE LEICA AND 28MM AND YOUR PHOTOS ARE NOT UNAWARE PEDESTRIANS EVERYONE IS LAUGHING AT YOU AND IT IS RUINING YOUR PHOTOS
things that are important for wedding photography:
venue lighting. if you can get two continuous lights on the altar placed to your taste, you are miles ahead of some holy trinity zoom faggot retard dumbass hylic idiot moron.
business skills! the venue lit well enough to be a studio, or you bring a studio to the venue, the bride needs to be on board. many photographs will be taken without flash, but you will need multiple people in focus. you need the lighting not the magic lens.
seriously, business skills. you WILL need more than one photographer on site at least. a guy with a camera is not a wedding photography business. it's a guy with a camera. especially if you offer video, which you must.
competent videography skills! duh.
competent editing skills! capture one, deep prime AI topaz dxo whatever, pile it on, authentic detail is not noticed on canvas prints and social media posts but noisy as fuck photos are. no cANONfag autism please. all of your photos will end up 4mp or printed.
things that are not important for wedding photography:
$4000 200mm f1.8 prime lenses
f2.8 zooms
sensor cope (you use 36+ megapixel full frame, ok, deal with it)
