>>55973772Pidgeot: 8/10, beast design, bad everything else.
Noctowl: 9/10, best designed regional bird, great in Pokemon Go, meh in base game.
Swellow: 9/10, absolute demon powerhouse for nuzlockes, okay design.
>>55973774Butterfree: 7/10, a classic, but why does it look so much like Venonat?
Beautifly: 5/10, inoffensive, but basically just Butterfree again.
Dustox: 8/10, okay design, but a beast in nuzlockes.
>>55973778Raticate: 5/10, useful mon, but looks really bland and ugly.
Furret: 10/10, he walk
Linoone: 6/10, best HM slave, but not very interesting otherwise.
>>55973782Fearow: 5/10, better in-game than Pidgeot, but ugly.
Xatu: 7/10, useless in battle, but fantastic design. Deserves more attention.
Pelipper: 9/10, good, iconic design, and currently widely used in a restricted VGC format.
>>55973845Caterpie: 8/10, basically just a real animal, but at least it's a cool one.
Weedle: 3/10, boring all around
Wurmple: 6/10, will never evolve into the one you want.
>>55973852Alakazam: 10/10, neat design, absolute beast in-game.
Wobuffet: 9/10, weird but original, niche Pokémon that no other mon is able to emulate.
Gardevoir: 0/10, gave me a fake number.
>>55973855Ninetales: 10/10, one of the best designs, amazing ability, but why isn't it a ghost or psychic dual type?
Arcanine: 10/10, a beast in every way. There is not one single thing wrong with this good boy.
Rapidash: 5/10 It's a horse with a fire mane. It's a tried and true concept, just not an interesting iteration on it.
>>55973859Magmar: 4/10, ugly as sin, but great in VGC with an eviolite.
Electabuzz: 7/10, I have no idea what this thing is supposed to be, but it's iconic and cool.
Jynx: 0/10, I am convinced Game Freak hates Ice types uniquely because of this thing. It has no redeeming features.