Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.
Threads by latest replies - Page 126
Clueless Faggot
General for Cars, Bikes, Motorsport, and anything else /o/ worthy. I don't give a fuck if they aren't masterpieces, I want to see it.
Clueless Faggot
>>4425241 Dutch angles really went well with lots of the scenes. The lighting was good, my technique was getting more consistent, and having a zoom lens on hand instead of a prime meant I was getting composition right OOC. Positioning and technique was the most important factors at play. Even if nothing came out perfect, I truly was enjoying this and getting better.
Clueless Faggot
>>4425245 As an aside. I tried speaking with a few other photogs there. Every Vietnamese vlogger and boomer with their old 70-200s was seemingly here, so I thought it might be a good chance to have a chat. Every. Single. Person just used the excuse to fag on about their gear. One person actually got talking to me about composition and idea, and it was only after I brushed off his questions about my gear.
It was disappointing really. Dozens upon dozens of photogs, and all anyone wanted to talk about was how much thier lens cost.
Clueless Faggot
Quoted By:
>>4425246 Not many cars is the paddock were that interesting, but I have a soft spot for 90s ferrarris.
I've got more to process, and will come back later. Critiques welcomed.
Anonymous
>>4425237 hey, i like your photos, but i made one of threads already
>>4424650 and i put some work into the picrel and i was hoping ppl would use that thread!
Clueless Faggot
Quoted By:
>>4425249 Fuuuuuuuuck. Yep, that sounds good.
>>4424650
Anonymous
You do not have to stay loyal to one ecosystem.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4424991 I just spend 6 months with a canon 5dmkIV and a Blazar remus for anamorphics. Will sell it all and get a fuji gfx100 setup. Maybe after that I will experiment a little with analog Leicas
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4424991 gearfags are married to the brand they chose at random at age 16
Anonymous
Unless you are a literal professional, you don’t need to be in an “ecosystem” at all. Amateurs that own a bazillion different lenses probably gravitate to like 2 primes 90% of the time anyway. Only insane people or professionals should have enough lenses to be financially tied to a camera system.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4425061 Agreed that professionals shouldn't do this constant ecosystem hopping strategy. It's only fun for hobbyists.
But many professionals for sure would be better off with a few good lenses instead of a catalogue.
Anonymous
Lens : Nikon 58mm f/0.95
Anonymous
>>4424988 Why not shoot at f.95???
Anonymous
>>4424989 0.95f doesn't have a catchphrase
Anonymous
>>4424992 Do you have a catchphrase for it?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4424994 I round up and call it F1
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I made a custom Gemini that is designed to analyze photography from a neutral perspective.
Anonymous
>>4424972 I may remember accepting your application/viewing your portfolio. I was feeling generous that day because I just got news of 18 more photography awards I earned that week.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>4424959 My dad works for Nintendo. Wat nau?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4424980 It is alright. It is very alright.
>>4424981 Cool story bro. Doubt he has as many photography awards as I do.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4424726 this slop is just as unhelpful and retarded as asking for critique here but without op risking being called a faggot
This guy had his number leaked
Quoted By:
He is a bad person and he deserves to get that, I have nothing else to say, he just deserved it and that's it. The harassment of a 7-year-old boy by asking him to give him the male device
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I'm compiling a list of ILC 'enthusiast level' cameras that have both IBIS and a 90degree (minimum) tilting screen. I've excluded budget or entry level models like the Olympus PL line or triple digit Panasonic's. I have also excluded 'pro' level gear like the Nikon z8/z89 and Fuji GFX cameras. I have also excluded all Sony cameras because I am not interested in buying a Sony.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4421831 Yeah, you'll get the best colors of any brand but only when the other brands have a handicap
Anonymous
you don't need ibis if you're not fat
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4422278 If you have a steady hold it'll be even better with ibis. I did a quasi-long exposure on a waterfall recently handheld with a 100mm lens thanks to ibis.
Anonymous
>>4422278 no fat people do better without IBIS
>what do you mean my canon IS lens is too big? i dont feel a thing. >essential tremor? imagine being skinny enough to shake. >t. the living pillow Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4422378 For real, the peak photographer body is a mountain of fat, an immobile hamplanet. The wind and vibrations caused by passing traffic may make his fat rolls jiggle slightly, but these vibrations are quickly dampened, unable to move his unfathomably heavy core, like a tripod with a backpack full of lead pulling it down to the earth, he is binding the camera to a fixed point in space with the force of gravity. Breathing, the beating heart, all of those moving parts in a human body are insulated under a thick layer of fat, making them cause minimal vibrations outside the soundproof shell.
Anonymous
The general consensus seems to be they're identical, spec-wise. Which body would be more capable for motorsport photography, though?
Anonymous
>>4424873 Z5 II has the joystick, but appears to have a slower burst (10 FPS RAW; ZF has 14 FPS RAW)
Anonymous
>>4424875 They're the same (10fps 14 bit, 14fps 12 bit)
>meanwhile in snoy land: 7fps 14 bit, 10fps 12 bit Anonymous
>>4424887 >They're the same (10fps 14 bit, 14fps 12 bit) So it's true that the main difference between ZF and Z5 II is the body ergonomics?
>meanwhile in snoy land: 7fps 14 bit, 10fps 12 bit I never understood how could people buy A7IV when it has razor-sharp autofocus which can only detect eyes/faces.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4424873 Z5II unless you want the dials / aesthetic
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4424888 >I never understood how people could buy a sony many photographers have asked this question, no one has ever gotten a good answer. sony is like photography apple but they can't design good software so their position is wholly unjustified and relies on extremely aggressive marketing.
Anonymous
Looking at buying one of these for a photography uni project. I’m majoring in design and have absolutely no clue how to use a film camera. Would it be easy for a moon like me to get used to it in a week to make a photo book with? What should I be cautious of?
Anonymous
XA2 probably the better option if you want a Trip 35 but in the smaller factor with the additional shutter speeds
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4418592 i came into the thread to say this. after a rewatch of flcl i've been looking into buying the XA2 this weekend
Anonymous
>>4412598 I like Technology Connections too, but there are way better first film cameras. Zone focus is mega gay and difficult for a beginner, and these things tend to have a bunch of other issues. I would recommend getting an SLR so you can have full manual focus and actually see how focus and aperture effects your images before you take them.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4412598 If it's just for a project, get a disposable camera. They are cheap and easy to use.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4420563 This, or a rangefinder with a fixed lens. Those are cheap as well, and they often have a very usable 40mm focal length. Like some Minolta HiMatic
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Psst...No time to explain, just don't use lenses with electrical contacts.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4420547 >I took the premise of your idea and reversed it This is not actually engaging with the idea but the underlying theme. All it establishes is that there isn't much gained by regressing further.
Also this thread isn't about autofocus, I specifically stated that "that is a topic for another thread"
This thread is about image correction.
Anonymous
>>4420238 But then IBIS won't work as well, right?
Anonymous
>>4420753 What do you mean? Many cameras with IBIS will allow you to input the focal length, so contacts are not required
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4420754 True. But do you still get the 5 axis IBIS then or are you limited to 3 axis? And does manually inputting the focal length work as well as the automatic function? Since many lenses aren't exactly the same focal length they are advertised as (for example the Sigma 35mm f2 is a 32.5mm in reality).
Anonymous
Quoted By:
It's ok, I made sure I can rotate focus ring and aperture ring without electronic contacts connected to anything.
Anonymous
What's the point of this type of posing/facial expressions (pic rel)? It's common on social media and, as far as I know, mainly among women. I guess its origin is in the modelling industry. Well what is it trying to convey? To me it comes across as completely devoid of any emotion and consequently purposeless and pretentious.
Anonymous
pic related
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4423935 A little chunky and waist, but I approve.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4423727 It's aesthetic
Simple as
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
left activates female neurons
