Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.
Threads by latest replies - Page 9
Anonymous
how do we actually feel about these after all these years
Anonymous
>>4525527 Why in God's name would you waste time and effort wrangling an AI into making a picture of a disposable camera that doesn't even exist when you could right-click -> save as and get a better thread pic for less effort? What is wrong with you? Did someone drop you on your head when you were 3?
Fuckin kill yourself, faggot.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4526004 because it is a bot making the post to begin with
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4525720 >once Well at least you're not doing it any more I guess.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4525527 These are pretty fancy. The REALLY cheap ones could literally be snapped into the body of a roll of 110 film and the film was the how you held the camera. I got one at Burger King. I think it was some type of promotional giveaway. Damned if the pictures didn't actually come out nice, for a piece of molded plastic holding a lens and a shutter:)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4526004 it's bait and you took it
Anonymous
>Nocturnal photography (also referred to as night photography) refers to the practice of taking photographs outdoors between dusk and dawn, when natural light is minimal or nonexistent. >The low-light conditions night photographers work in require specialized techniques to achieve proper exposure, including long exposures—ranging from several seconds to days—higher ISO sensitivity, or artificial lighting. >The genre encompasses a wide range of subjects, including urban and rural landscapes, architecture, industrial sites, and astrophotography. Post your night photos!
Anonymous
Hi everyone. First of all, thanks for the thread—it’s exactly the kind I love. Could some of you please give me some feedback on my photo? I have a lot to learn, and I know there are so many people who are talented both in theory and in practice, so if you’re willing to share your insights, I’d love to hear them.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4509597 I like the composition but the veil spoils the pic.
>>4509730 Love the foggy vibe.
>>4509870 I don't appreciate how you managed the colors but you sure grasped something nice.
>>4509942 Love it, could use some contrast and darker shades
>>4509954 Changes from tje usual city sights, lovely
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>4525820 the colors in your pic are great, but the composition is all over the place. it seems like you wanted to center a light but that's not perfectly center. there's a random building to the side, and i can't see where the end of the objects you feature at the edges of the picture- they're just cutoff. the story your photo tells is incongruent and contrived- it feels like i'm walking down a sidewalk, but i'm forced to look in a very odd direction.
if i were you i'd take another pic at this location, but go down the sidewalk and commit to taking a pic with the light AND the building in one frame. or you could try taking a pic of the light and an object from a low angle to add a sense of height. focus on telling a story with a picture.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4525943 You put words on what seemed off when I looked at this pic. I couldn't wrap my head around what exactly spoiled what I tried to do. As you explained, I wanted to tell something, or at least to capture something, but you clearly explained why I failed. Your feedback is greatly appreciated, thanks a lot.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Any of you use an 8x10 before? Is it as cozy as it seems.
Anonymous
Honestly, no. 5x7 is the point where you still have portability and more lens options, 8x10 goes in the little too big, little too heavy, little too cumbersome territory. 8x10 negatives are beautiful and working with them is fun but the camera itself is honestly PITA.
Anonymous
>>4525774 Eh but then you're insanely limited on film. Might as well go for broke and just go 4x5 and 8x10. Lens selection is not too bad for 8x10, but they do get BIG and expensive very very quickly. Process lenses are relatively inexpensive and usually cover 8x10 but they usually need an external shutter.
You can also get a convertible lens and they can have 3 seperate focal lengths for the size of one.
Anonymous
>>4525834 True but Ilford and Foma have 5x7 covered for B&W and for colour I just buy roll from chinks and cut sheets myself because fuck both Fuji and Kodak sheet prices.
Anonymous
>>4525871 Where are you getting c41 large format rolls from? I have been wanting a cheap color negative for 8x10
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4525951 You can get roll of Shenguang (old Shanghai C41 emulsion) from Taobao sometimes, you just have to be lucky and patient since they don't really produce enough of it. It comes down to like 60 cents per sheet once cut which is still a steal compared to every other option.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
So when are we doing this again?
Anonymous
>>4523171 I guess he doesn't like it when someone has insight about women that he does not.
Anonymous
Sailens !ymQ5god3II
Quoted By:
L O N D O N O N D O N
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4509217 This real or AI?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4523250 >someone has insight about women >4chan camera autists
Anonymous
Why has the world abandoned photo shoots of good looking women? 99% of anything I see now is selfies and if its a photoshoot its just to sell clothing or some super generic looking agency testshoot. 10 years ago or whatever the world was full of every good looking girl doing multiple photoshoots just for content. What happened?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
OP isnt trying
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4517018 >Once you have a portfolio it is much easier to find TFP models. what if you use AI to fake a portfolio
Anonymous
Any excuse good enough to spam beauty
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
hit a yard sale this morning wasn't expecting much, old folding table in someone's driveway, and there's a Hasselblad just sitting there next to a TLR and a SX-70 like nobody told them what they were worth, grabbed a couple rolls of film out of a wooden box for basically nothing, the guy selling it all clearly just inherited someone's whole life of shooting and had no idea, walked away with more than I came for and spent less than I would on lunch, this is why you stop at the folding table
Anonymous
taking a photo of that table or/and the hassy would be too much right, ai generated slop is the way to go kys with your cheeky little story
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4525873 lets develop film bros, grab your chemistry and meet me in the red light
Anonymous
>>4525868 Sage goes in all fields
Anonymous
Anonymous
How long can you let it sit after exposing but before developing? Online I see everything from "you should develop within a few days of exposure" to "you can leave it up till its expiry date no problem". I asked a local camera shop and they said 6-10 months before you start to see degradation depending on the film. Who's telling the truth? I don't remember ever worrying about this back when I was using disposable cameras for everything.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4520311 Exposed low iso B&W negative film can take moar time than high ISO color slide film in same conditions. And conditions matter a lot. A car glovebox at summer will challenge any film, exposed of not.
Cold storage allows exposed film keep for decades in fair state, see for example
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andr%C3%A9e's_Arctic_balloon_expedition Anonymous
>>4520349 >If it's out and you live in Thailand, it will start to shift in a matter of weeks Shit.
I've had a roll in my old point and shoot from 2006. I wonder if I have to take it to some specialist place to have developed? I only want one photo from it as it's of sentimental value. Doesn't have to be great quality.
Anonymous
>>4525855 I don't think such a specialist exists unfortunately for you. Is it color or black and white? B&W is more stable. The variables that matter are heat and humidity. The effect of heat is exponential once your reach about 30° celsius, but if it was inside and in a relatively stable environment like the bottom of a cupboard it might be still salvageable. The damage also caps with time it seems, so after 20 years it will probably be really blurry and foggy but you may still get recognizable images. In any case if you can share somz images with us along with storage conditions it would be cool.
Anonymous
>>4525858 It was in the basement (coolest part of the house) for years. When I got into photography and got a digital I eventually started keeping it in my drycabinet in my room, that fluctuates when the turn the AC on and off etc.
I have to find somewhere in Bangkok to finally develop this.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4525859 overall those seems like good conditions. I would say it's likely the photos will be salvageable with some editing.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Eclipse edition
Former thread:
>>4519819 Took this one in Paris as the eclipse was winding down. Spanishbros, post your eclipse pics.
Anonymous
Ok I post another crappy photo and we can all move to a new thread.
Anonymous
>>4525694 >new thread didn't happen it's over for /rpt/
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4525747 If you have a recent photo you should be the change you want to be in this world instead of waiting for someone else to do it.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I want to start a /p/ monthly, or tri-monthly, photo competition where the prize is actually desirable and relevant to photography: film rolls. Of course, they’ll be cheap, readily-available film stock like Ultramax 400 or Gold 200, or whatever else is easy and inexpensive to get ahold of, but the problem is this: how shall voting stay honest, and how shall the winner’s address stay anonymous when I send him the prize? I don’t want the poll’s integrity to be compromised, nor the winner’s anonymity. Who has some ideas for how this could be set up?
Anonymous
>>4525798 Excuse me, I do the bulk of effort post critiques and info on here and have actually served as judge for local photo contests
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4525819 How about we have a pre-competition competition to elect judges? We could probably get away with a public vote for that. You could even have unlimited submissions, but 1 per trip, and then each trip that wins a judging position gets to judge the real competition.
Anonymous
>>4525816 >some you may like >and some may now rig your poll with the help of a brazilian, $3.50, and a VPN Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4525824 Well yeah the seething autist nophoto made the worst photographer on /p/ poll after getting shit on for the 999th time by yesphotos.
Of course he was going to rig it. Wouldn't you?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4525824 ALSO. The creator of the poll rigged it before and after huskyfag aka ken rockwell aka mossad agent 69 rigged it, so I say it was a fair play.
Anonymous
I took this photo with a friend of mine as a souvenir but like there's something I did wrong and that this photo doesn't look very good to me, do you have any other tips on what I can improve in this photo /p/?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4525715 well it's all blurry because the camera is too bad at focusing and resolving detail in low light, and there's no subject so it's just some kind of empty void
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4525715 put it on a tripod and expose it for 30 seconds
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4525799 OP here I liked this model it even looks like an album model